Dr Maros Krivy presented at the DESIGNING GEOPOLITICS workshop, Urban Studies, University of Basel this weekend. Maros presented:

Designing the Scientific and Technological Revolution in Etarea

The Etarea project for a settlement of 135,000 inhabitants, conceived by architect Gorazd Čelechovský and exhibited at the Monteral EXPO 1967, is my presentation’s entry point to study how systems theory informed urban and territorial visions of post-war state socialism in Eastern Europe. I examine how political and philosophical concepts, such as the ‘scientific and technological revolution,’ interacted with urbanism practiced and conceived as a creation of synthetic ‘living environments’. I am interested in the intellectual intersection of dialectical materialism and cybernetics, situating it in the context of distinct geopolitical conditions and ramifications.

Workshop program:

Workshop, Urban Studies, University of Basel
Saturday 20 January 2018
Kollegienhaus, Room 112

Geopolitics has emerged as a key term to understand the global dimensions of architecture, urbanism, and design in the twentieth century. In recent architectural and urban histories, however, geopolitics tends to mean little more than international relations, and the concept’s own historical trajectory—the subject of current scholarship in historical geography—remains largely unacknowledged.

Geopolitics was conceived at the turn of the twentieth century as a way to study the political effects of geography. Even though it was rooted in ancient theories of climatic determinism, the new discipline was propelled by the effects of industrialization and undergirded by social Darwinism and biological theories of the modern state. Geopolitical thinkers such as Friedrich Ratzel or Halford Mackinder did not limit geography to soil, climate, or other qualities of the Earth itself; they also considered the ways in which agriculture, industry, resource extraction, military power, and the new technological possibilities of transportation and communication influenced the international system of states and their territorial configuration. In short, geopolitics was not just determined by physical geography, it was also a matter of design. With the rise of technological modernism and economic planning in the interwar period, geopolitics and design became ever more closely related. Telecommunications, ports, roads, and other public works—now understood as part of a new rubric called “infrastructure”—were recognized as central to the development of nations. Even though the discipline itself lost its legitimacy after WWII, geopolitical thinking continued to shape sovereignty and subjectivity in the contexts of the Cold War and of decolonization. Dams, highways, and houses became the unquestioned material basis of post-independence nation-building and development.

This workshop brings together scholars of architectural and design history, historical geography, and science and technology studies to explore the nexus of geopolitics and design from the late nineteenth century to the present. Our aim is to study geopolitics beyond the bounds of nationalist propaganda, to include the various ways in which design thinking has shaped political geography and how geopolitical concepts and frameworks were integrated in the disciplines of architecture, urbanism, and design. How can technological systems, whether applied to the modernization of agriculture or the governance of cities, be understood as designed interventions in political geography? Rather than thinking of such systems and designs as invented in the North and exported to the South, or as laid over a pre-existing geography, we are interested in how the designs and geographies of globalization are co-produced. How has infrastructure building shaped the historical relationship between global North and global South? How have applications of systems theory reshaped national sovereignty and international relations? How do the geopolitics and ideological dimensions of infrastructure impact the construction of political subjectivity? What modes of being and seeing do such theoretical and material constructions produce?

This workshop builds on two previous workshops of the History and Theory of Architecture and Urbanism research group at the University of Basel: “Territoriality” (December 2015, organized by Kenny Cupers) and “Grounding Biopower: Inventions of Land and Landscape” (June 2017, organized by Ginger Nolan).


9.30am: Coffee and Welcome
10am: Introduction (Kenny Cupers, University of Basel)
10.30-12.00pm: Panel 1
Mark Bassin (Södertörn University)
Benjamin Schenk (University of Basel)
Peter Christensen (University of Rochester)
David Haney (University of Kent)
Moderator: Ginger Nolan (University of Basel)
12.00-1.30pm: Lunch
1.30-3.00pm: Panel 2
Orit Halpern (Concordia University)
Claudia Mareis (FHNW Basel)
Maros Krivy (Cambridge / Estonian Academy of Arts)
Dennis Pohl (UdK Berlin)
Moderator: Xenia Vytuleva (ETH)
3.00-3.30pm: Coffee
3.30-5.00pm: Panel 3
Rory Rowan (University of Zürich)
Lukas Pauer (Vertical Geopolitics Lab / Architectural Association)
Francesco Sebregondi (Goldsmiths College)
William Jamieson (Royal Holloway, University of London)
Moderator: Madeleine Herren-Oesch (University of Basel)
5-6pm: Final Discussion
Moderator: Sophie Oldfield (University of Cape Town/University of Basel)